Who Can Score More Chicks: Bill Gates or Steve Jobs?

steve_jobs_bill_gates

Steve Jobs and Bill Gates in 2007 during the All Things Digital conference.

Call it my eccentricity.

But as far as I have rummaged around the Internet, I have yet to find an article that features Steve and Bill’s ability to score babes based on their respective merits. News reports and written articles always feature these two characters along with their gadgets. It’s all techno stuff. It’s all business. It’s all money talk.

Well, thank God for idiosyncrasy. I’m pitting these two against each other.

In one corner, we have Bill Gates. And in the other, we have Steve Jobs. Let’s put these two individuals under a limelight and strip them of their CEO / chairman titles, and try to look at them as regular, beer-guzzling guys in real-world scenario with no chauffeurs, chefs and personal assistants. Ladies, try to judge them according to their merits, and not just on their good looks.

As chairman of Microsoft Corporation and his family-owned charitable foundation, Bill Gates has a whopping net worth of about $58 billion. Currently, he is the third richest man on the planet. With that amount of money, he could certainly afford to buy a small third-world country.

Bill’s interest in computers came into being when he was still an eighth grader at Lakeside School, an exclusive preparatory school. During that time, the school’s Mothers’ Club had used the proceeds of a rummage sale to purchase an ASR-33 teletype terminal and computer for the school’s students.

Bill’s fascination for computers grew when he discovered how the computer would always execute software code perfectly. He remarked that there was something neat about computers. Thus, he wrote his first computer program, which was a tic-tac-toe game that lets users to play a game against the computer.

In 1973, Bill graduated from Lakeside School with an outstanding SAT result, scoring 1590 out of 1600. He enrolled at Harvard College, where he met his future business partner. Bill never had definite study plan. He would always dabble in computers. This appetite for computers brought out his decision to start his own computer software company. And the rest is history.

Under Bill’s leadership, Microsoft Corporation emerged as the worldwide leader in the software industry. During the 2007, the company reported over $51 billion in revenues, employing over 78,000 people in 105 countries.

Aside from Microsoft, he also has other investments. Bill served as a director of Berkshire Hathaway, as well as Cascade Investments LLC, a private investment and holding firm. He also founded a think-tank company called bgC3.

On the philanthropic side, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the family-owned charitable foundation that Bill and his wife set up, supports humanitarian efforts and initiatives towards global health and education. The foundation has pledged billions of dollars to organizations aimed at alleviating global health conditions, as well as providing learning opportunities in certain low-income communities.

From 1993 to 2007, Bill has been consistent on the Forbes list. It was even reported that Bill reached a monstrous $101 billion in 1999; hence, the media’s nomenclature on him as the “Centribillionaire.” On this note, Bill remarked, wishing he was not the richest man because of the unwanted attention that goes with it.

With 15 years of Forbes list notoriety, it’s no wonder why people turn their heads towards him. Though he may not seek the attention that he gets right now, it is undeniable that Bill is a widely acclaimed entrepreneur, philanthropist and business tactician.

Steve Jobs, on the other hand, is the chairman and CEO of Apple, Inc., in addition to his duties as member of Walt Disney Company’s board of directors. Though his net worth is just a tenth of Bill’s at around $5 billion, Steve was named the most powerful person in business by Fortune Magazine in November 2007.

His acclaims also include his induction to the California Hall of Fame on December 5, 2007. The event, which was held at The California Museum for History, Women and the Arts, was attended by California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and his First Lady Maria Shriver.

Aside from Apple, Steve was also involved in another computer company. He established NeXT Computer at the same time he ran Apple. Unfortunately, the former ran aground due to minimal sales at only 50,000 units. Only a few could afford NeXT computers; thus, they were shelved off as cost-prohibitive.

Despite its steep price, some people bought NeXT computers for its technical strength in its software system. The company, subsequently, shifted to software development with the release of NeXTSTEP / Intel.

Steve also headed the famous animation company, Pixar. Back in 1986, Steve bought The Graphic Group, which was later renamed Pixar, from George Lucas, who needed the money to finance his divorce.

The company started out as a high-end graphics hardware developer. But due to unprofitable conditions in selling Pixar Image Computer, Steve entered into a contract with Disney to produce a series of computer-animated films.

Under Steve’s headship, Pixar produced a handful of astounding box-office hit films, such as A Bug’s Life, Toy Story, Monsters, Inc., Finding Nemo, and The Incredibles. However, Pixar was sold to Walt Disney Company back in 2006 for $7 billion in stocks. This deal made Steve the largest individual shareholder in Walt Disney Company, holding approximately 7% of the company’s stock.

On humble beginnings, Steve’s interest in computers became manifest when he frequently attended after-school lectures at the Hewlett-Packard Company in California. He also worked as a technician at a video games manufacturer. And to think, he took that job because he was intent of saving money for a spiritual retreat to India, not knowing that would be one of the initial steps that moulded him into a giant in the computer software industry.

Having the eye of an artist, Steve has always emphasized the aesthetic value of his products. Always adamant on visual aspect, he would persist even on the minute details. It’s no wonder why people adhere and appreciate the beauty of his creations, like the Macintosh and the iPod.

A perfect visualization of for phrase, Bill Gates and Steve Jobs has always been pushing the envelope. They have been the two most credited individuals that revolutionized the development of mass-market personal computers.

Significantly individualistic in their own right, Bill and Steve are both mirror reflections of each other and a parallel balance to the immense talent and knowledge each one has as they make up the opposite sides of a single equation, with one balancing out the other.

Bill Gates and Steve Jobs are the perfect synthesis and amalgamation of prescience and omniscience of what technology is and is about to be in the near future.

So, who can score more chicks: Bill Gates or Steve Jobs? Please cast your vote by posting your comments below.

Top 5 Must-Have Gadgets in Your Bag

Many of us have developed such a love for gadgets that we simply can’t leave home without it. Get your toothpaste and toothbrush out of your bag to make way for these:

1. iPhone 3Gs.
The iPhone is just about the most kickass phone on the planet right now. What’s more, it’s really more than just a phone, it’s jam-packed with more apps than I care to fiddle around with, it organizes my schedules, it allows me to get work done on the road. It provides full Web browsing at a much faster pace than my old Nokia phone. And not to mention SatNav, it goes with its impressive GPS capability. What else could a man ask for?

iPhone 3Gs

2. THE Digicam.
With the iPhone’s 2 megapixel camera, the pictures are just not going to be what one hopes it to be. So a Panasonic Lumix comes in handy. I like my photos to be very crisp, the colors have to be just in real life. Lumix uses Leica lens, and I think that speaks for itself. Still, this camera produces great quality pictures even at high zoom ranges. It’s great when you’re on the road trying to snap at something moving too.

panasonic_lumix

3. The Other Digicam.
Probably one of the best tech gadgets to have is the Kodak Easyshare Z612. This super refined digicam is impressive with a ton of features that you just don’t get from other point and click cameras. It’s actually a sub-SLR but I don’t get to use it much often. The menus are kind of tricky and so it functions like an instamatic for me.

Kodak Easyshare Z612

4. PSP.
This is great for those times you’re stuck in traffic, or waiting for a date. Sure, there are not much games coming out of the PS3 recently, but most PSP fans are happy with the games that they already have. My friend who’s an avid (rabid?) gamer recommends Nintendo’s DS Lite, but I just can’t see myself forking over that much money for another portable console just to while my time away.

psp

5. The Music Player.
Sorry Apple lovers, but while I’m bowled over by the iPhone, I pretty much hate the iPod. I find Creative’s Zen X-Fi better in a lot of aspects. For one, it has excellent sound quality, much better the iPod if I may say so. And that’s all that matters with music players, isn’t it? Zen also comes with a lot of other add-ons that makes it a more logical buy. It has a good FM radio and a nice screen. It came with great headphones. And it has Wi-Fi, but it’s thoroughly limited.

Creative Zen X-Fi

Now, what’s in your bag?

Top 5 Recent Microsoft Moments

The only news about Microsoft from recent years that you need to know.

5. Microsoft finds itself face to face with Google

While Microsoft continued to bully everybody else, Google was biding its time and came up with Google Chrome this year. Google minced no words: they wanted a piece of what Microsoft has in business applications. It was sick of being a non-player in business applications and had decided to take the bully head on. The announcement of Chrome was the culmination of years of battle in other front: e-mail, the purchase of Yahoo!, and yes, search.

Continue reading

Google vs. Microsoft – Who Will Win?

Previously, we saw how Microsoft and Google clash with each other, especially overlapping on auxiliary services. We try to answer the more interesting question of who’s up and who’s losing.
So who’s winning? The easy answer is: we all are. Take for example Firefox. In Google’s Web pages, if you use an outdated browser, they tell you to upgrade to Chrome, Firefox or the not-so-secure IE8. In Microsoft’s Web pages, they tell you to upgrade to Firefox, IE7 or IE8, while skipping mention of Chrome altogether. In both, Firefox benefits the most. So do the rest of us, who can expect better services at lower prices (or for free) if the battle of Goliaths continue.

But that’s the easy answer I don’t like to cop out anymore. I am going to venture into educated guesses. Both companies win at their own respective core competencies: Microsoft at business applications, Google at search and online advertising. But whoever wins the bidding war for Yahoo! will emerge as the winner.

For some aspects, it’s not that clear-cut. Both Hotmail and Gmail are saddled with their own drawbacks that it is difficult to pick out a clear winner. Moreover, browsers for both companies are not as functional as Firefox, so they lose to a third player. In terms of usage though, IE is the frontrunner. Their advances in cloud computing is also at par with each other, with one making the same inroads as the other.

Generally, however, Google wins, or would win, over Microsoft for two reasons. In my opinion, Microsoft has been coming out with updated versions of its software that each becomes bloated over time. What you get with the latest version of Word, for example, is a completely new interface that replaced age-old menu and shortcut keys, proving to be a little difficult to learn and get used to. You get slower applications saddled with useless functionalities. Why? This is precisely because Microsoft needs the money from new versions and updates of their applications. They certainly can’t earn money from the MS Word you bought a few years ago. Or the XP license you already use. They need to come up with "better" upgrades, with "more" features.

Google is not saddled by this concern. So what you get are simple, functional applications that run faster than its Microsoft counterpart. Take Chrome for example. It’s speedy, with a simple interface. But it’s fully functional, or promises to be.

The second reason for Google’s future win is that it’s free. Whatever little edge Microsoft has over Google in terms of experience and seniority will soon be wiped out. Why? Because Google applications are free to use. Free often means widespread adoption. This is clearly seen in another office productivity suite, OpenOffice. Already, the open source alternative has been taken up by more progressive businesses looking for an alternative to Microsoft Office, with 15% to 20% of businesses taking it up as early as 2004, and with more than 27 million downloads only for its latest version 3.0 in less than three months. Google is a staunch believer and supporter of the open source movement and it has been giving away its products and services for free. The popularity of Google rests on this model, and would soon propel it over Microsoft.

Goliath vs. Goliath (Google vs. Microsoft)

In the world of computers, one likes to think that everything is equal. Technology is boundless and with the right skills and vision, coupled with creative ideas, any company – big or small – and even individuals for that matter can come up with the next big thing. In the recent years, we have been peppered with the success stories of online sites such as eBay, Amazon, and YouTube. By extension, blogs also gave rise to Internet superstars like the Numanuma kid, Lonelygirl115, power blogger Perez Hilton, and MySpace Tom Anderson.

Continue reading

Microsoft and the Failing Zunes

Zune vs IPod

Zune vs IPod

As with the rest of the world, I have a love-hate relationship with Microsoft. While the programmer and computer user in me loves Microsoft for its work in developing Windows, SaaS and the .NET framework, I join the mob in vilifying Microsoft for its “greed” (well, it IS a business, I’d concede to that) and its booboos (security lapses in its products top the long list!).

Continue reading